Skip to content
Aviation

Faster delivery for engineering and operations technology teams under aviation regulators.

Your engineering and operations technology teams ship faster without loosening a single control. AI agents do the routine work of planning, coding, testing, releasing and watching production, and every step lands in a record your safety, compliance monitoring and audit teams can read.

For engineering, operations technology, security, safety and compliance teams at airlines, airports, maintenance organisations and aerospace suppliers, in the UK, the EU and the US.

Why it slips today

Where the hours and the risk go.

530%
Rise in reported cyber incidents
In its 2021 think paper, EUROCONTROL reported a 530% rise in reported cyber incidents from 2019 to 2020.
1 in 5
Organisations breached through shadow AI
In IBM's 2025 study, one in five organisations had a breach involving AI tools staff use without approval.
156%
More malicious open-source packages
Sonatype counted 512,847 malicious open-source packages in the twelve months to its 2024 report, up 156% on the year before.
Engineers use AI tools on their laptops that nobody approved, and code, prompts and logs go to outside AI services.
The trace from requirements to code and tests is rebuilt by hand before each review.
Changes are approved in one tool, built in another and deployed from a third, so evidence is gathered by hand before every audit.
Incidents are worked across chat, phone and spreadsheets while reporting clocks run.
Use cases

The routine engineering work, done inside your boundary.

The airborne software trace, kept current

A design assurance AI agent keeps the trace from each requirement to its code, reviews and tests up to date on every change, ready for your DO-178C process. Every assurance decision and sign-off stays with the people your process names.

Part-IS and NIS incident reporting

Each incident gets a timeline, the evidence and the people on call as it happens, so your incident manager starts the 72-hour report from the facts. Whether to report stays with your people.

Crew tracking and maintenance record services

Alerts on the services behind crew, maintenance and the airport land in the channel that owns them, and the SRE on-call AI agent opens the incident and finds the release behind it. A person approves any rollback.

Airworthiness security reviews

The security review AI agent checks every change for risky patterns, secrets and access changes before a person decides the merge, and keeps a record of each security-relevant change for your DO-326A process.

Evidence for CAA and EASA oversight

Change, incident and access evidence is ready for your compliance monitoring programme and your authority's audits. The compliance evidence AI agent assembles each pack for a person to sign off.

Every change reviewed on another model

A reviewer AI agent on a different AI model checks every change against its acceptance criteria, and a person decides the merge. No AI agent ever approves its own work.

Builds from your approved libraries

Builds use mirrored copies of the open-source packages you approve, inside your boundary, and the dependency AI agent prepares each update as a change for review.

One issue card per problem

AI connects uptime, logs, metrics and traces into one card that names the likely cause beside your release history, so engineers start from an explanation rather than a wall of alerts.

Before and after

The same week, with JuhJuh.

SituationAt 2:10am the crew tracking service starts failing.
Before

The on-call engineer works the incident across chat, phone and separate monitoring tools, and the timeline is written up afterwards.

After

The SRE on-call AI agent opens the incident, finds the release that caused it and sends her a voice note. She approves the rollback with one tap, and the service is healthy by 2:31am, before the first departures.

SituationInternal audit asks for every change to the crew tracking service last quarter.
Before

Engineers gather approvals, builds and release notes by hand from three different tools.

After

The compliance evidence AI agent assembles the record from the linked ticket, review, approval, build and release, and the head of engineering signs it off.

SituationA design review is due on a change to airborne software.
Before

The trace from requirements to code and tests is rebuilt by hand before the review.

After

Requirements, code, reviews, tests and builds were linked as the work happened, and the people your design assurance process names make every decision.

Who it is for

Every role gets time back.

Chief information officer and chief technology officerFaster delivery across every team, with one standard and one record.
Chief information security officerAI kept inside your boundary, access through your own sign-in and a record of every action for your information security management system.
Head of engineeringEvery change built to the same standard, whoever or whatever wrote it.
Head of operations technologyThe systems behind flight operations, crew, maintenance and the airport watched in one place, with the routine work done for you.
Platform engineers and SREsPipelines, releases, alerts and on-call in one place, with the routine work done for you.
Software engineersTickets turned into reviewed, tested changes, with your time spent on design and judgement.
Head of design assuranceRequirements, code, reviews and tests traced in one record, with every assurance decision kept with your people.
Safety managerChanges and incidents in the systems that support safe operations linked in one record your safety management system can draw on.
Compliance monitoring manager and internal auditChange, incident and access evidence ready for your compliance monitoring programme and your authority's audits.
Control and where it runs

A person approves anything consequential.

What your AI agents never do on their own

  • Merge a change, deploy to production or roll back. A person decides.
  • Approve their own work. A different AI agent on a different model reviews it, and a person approves.
  • Make a design assurance decision or sign off a verification or configuration record for airborne software.
  • Change production settings, access or secrets, or add a library to your approved list.
  • Decide whether to report an incident or an occurrence to an authority. Your incident manager or safety manager decides.
  • Sign off evidence for an auditor or an authority.

Self-hosted, connected or air-gapped

JuhJuh runs as your own installation, in your own cloud account or your own data centre, connected or fully air-gapped. Open-weight models from the Mistral, DeepSeek, GLM and Kimi families run inside it, and public model families such as Claude, GPT and Gemini are added only where your rules allow.

When your AI agents run only on your own models, passenger data, flight operations and maintenance records, aircraft and avionics designs and security plans never leave your boundary unless you connect an outside service or approve sending them out. Our engineers install it with you and configure it to the controls your authority and your design assurance process need.

Bring AI into your engineering teams, inside your boundary.

Start with one or two teams, then add the rest when you are ready. That's the juju.

JuhJuh uses cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site, and optional analytics cookies to count visitors. We set no advertising or marketing cookies. Only essential cookies are turned on by default. Cookie Policy

Essential

Required for the site to function

Analytics

A first-party visitor ID, so we can count returning visitors. Not shared with anyone.